All Slots Casino Sister Sites
Which brands share a company with All Slots, which only share the software, and how to check either claim yourself in about a minute — including what "licensed" does and does not mean in Canada.
Why Canadians Search for Alternatives
Three reasons account for almost all of it. The welcome offer has been used and someone wants another one. A withdrawal took longer than expected and the instinct is to try somewhere else. Or the site is unavailable — in which case the outage page is a better first stop than a new registration, because most outages are measured in minutes.
The first reason is the one worth pushing back on. Group-wide terms restrict a welcome offer to one per person across every brand in the family, so registering at a sister site specifically to claim the same match a second time is the classic way to have winnings voided at both. It is not a grey area and it is not enforced inconsistently — shared platforms share device and payment fingerprints.
The second reason usually dissolves once you know that a pending window is not a payment problem. Every brand on this platform runs the same 24 to 48 hour approval step; moving sites does not skip it. That is set out in detail on the withdrawal times page.
Who Actually Runs All Slots
All Slots is one of the long-running Malta-operated brands built on Microgaming software — now Games Global after that business was sold off. Ownership within this family has been reorganised more than once over two decades, brands have been transferred between corporate entities, and any guide that states a company name as settled fact is telling you what was true when it was written.
So the useful instruction is not a name, it is a method: scroll to the footer of whichever site you are on, read the operating company and the licence number printed there, and look that number up in the Malta Gaming Authority licensee register. That takes a minute and it is current by definition. Canada's own Kahnawà:ke Gaming Commission publishes its interactive permit holders grouped by operating company, which is worth a look for the same reason.
A licence number that changes is not automatically a red flag, either. Malta reissues, and Curacao moved from its old master and sub-licence system to direct licences from the Curacao Gaming Authority, so numbers across the industry legitimately changed. A missing number, a number that returns nothing in the register, or a company name that does not match the one on the licence — those are the red flags.
There is no Canadian licence to look up. Canada regulates gambling provincially, and the only province that licenses private online casinos is Ontario, through the AGCO with iGaming Ontario as the conduct manager. Any operator serving Ontario players must appear on iGO's public operator list — check there, not on the casino's own about page. Everywhere else in Canada, provincial corporations run their own sites and offshore brands operate under Malta or Curacao licences.
How to Confirm a Real Sister Site Yourself
We do not publish a fixed ownership list, because brands in this family have moved between entities and a list written in April is a liability by September. Here is the four-signal check instead. Two matches is coincidence — shared software produces that on its own. All four is a group.
The operating company in the footer
Not the brand name — the registered company, usually with a Malta or Curacao address after it. Two sites naming the same company are the same business, full stop.
The licence number next to it
Look it up in the regulator's register. The register names the holder, and the holder is what you are comparing. The Kahnawà:ke permit list is the friendliest one for this job because it is grouped by company rather than by brand. A number nobody can find is worth walking away from.
The wording of the terms
Open both sets of T&Cs and search for an unusual clause — the reverse withdrawal rules, or the maximum bet while a bonus is active. Verbatim identical wording means shared legal drafting, which means one company.
The bank statement descriptor
Deposit the minimum at each and compare what your bank shows. The same processor descriptor across two brands is the strongest single signal there is, because it is the money, not the marketing.
Same Platform, Not Necessarily the Same Owner
Jackpot City, Spin Casino, Ruby Fortune, Gaming Club and Royal Vegas are the names that come up whenever All Slots alternatives are discussed, and for good reason: they are the long-established Malta-run brands on the same Microgaming lineage. If you like the All Slots lobby, you will recognise all five instantly — same game supplier, same cashier design, very similar terms.
What we are deliberately not doing is telling you which of them currently share an operating company with All Slots. We have not evidenced that to a standard worth publishing, and shared platform is not shared ownership. Run the four checks above on any two of them and you will have a better answer than any list, including this one, could give you.
The practical consequence of shared platform without shared ownership: a self-exclusion at one will not touch the other, support is a different team, and a complaint escalates to a different licensee. Those are exactly the things that matter when something goes wrong, and they are the things a "sister sites" list tends to blur.
Licence Checker
Pick a brand to see which regulator it answers to, what its Canadian status is, and where to verify the claim in a public register. The tool tells you where to look — it does not replace looking.
Five Alternatives Side by Side
| Brand | Relationship to All Slots | Regulator shown | Canadian licence | Best known for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All Slots Casino | — | Malta Gaming Authority | None | Slot depth, Interac payouts |
| Jackpot City | Same platform lineage | Malta Gaming Authority | Check iGO list | Progressive jackpots |
| Spin Casino | Same platform lineage | Malta Gaming Authority | Check iGO list | Live dealer tables |
| Ruby Fortune | Same platform lineage | Malta Gaming Authority | None | Low-key, long-running |
| Gaming Club | Same platform lineage | Malta Gaming Authority | None | One of the oldest brands online |
| Royal Vegas | Same platform lineage | Malta Gaming Authority | None | Loyalty programme |
"Same platform lineage" is a statement about the software and the cashier, not about ownership. Verify the operating company yourself using the four signals above before treating any two of these as the same business.
Rules That Apply Across the Whole Family
One welcome offer per person
Across every brand under the same operator, not per site. Claiming twice is bonus abuse under the terms and voids the winnings, usually at the withdrawal stage rather than at the deposit.
One account per brand
Duplicate accounts are closed and balances held. Households sharing an address and a device are a genuine grey area — declare it to support up front rather than discovering it at your first payout.
Verification does not transfer
Being verified at one brand means nothing at another, even under the same company. Budget for the same ID and proof-of-address upload every time you open an account.
The cashier behaves identically
Same rails, same C$20 floor, same 24 to 48 hour pending window. Switching brands to get paid faster does not work, because the slow part is shared.
Self-exclusion must be asked for group-wide
Say it explicitly, get it confirmed in writing, then check each brand separately. Do not assume an exclusion travels with the platform, because it travels with the company.
Complaints go to the licensee
An unresolved dispute escalates to whichever regulator issued the licence in the footer — Malta, or Curacao. Not to a Canadian body, because none of them has jurisdiction outside Ontario.
When a Sister Site Is the Wrong Answer
If you are in Ontario, none of this is the right route. Ontario has a regulated market with operators registered with the AGCO and listed by iGaming Ontario, and those sites answer to a body you can actually complain to. Using an offshore brand from Ontario means giving up that recourse for no benefit.
If you are looking for a second welcome bonus, a sister site is specifically the wrong answer, for the reasons in the section above. And if you are looking for a different experience rather than a different logo, a brand on the same platform will not give you one — the lobby, the cashier and the terms are the same product.
If you are opening a second account because you have already excluded yourself from the first, stop. That is the situation self-exclusion exists for, and the group-wide request plus ConnexOntario or your provincial support line is the path, not another registration form.
Sister Site Questions
What are All Slots Casino sister sites?
Sister sites are casinos that share an operating company, a licence holder, or the platform underneath. All Slots grew up in the Microgaming-powered family of Malta-run brands, so Jackpot City, Spin Casino, Ruby Fortune, Gaming Club and Royal Vegas share most of its lobby, its cashier and its terms. Which of them share an actual company changes over time, which is why the checker on this page links the register rather than asking you to trust a list.
Who operates All Slots Casino?
The brand is run from Malta and the footer names the operating company along with a Malta Gaming Authority licence number. Ownership of individual brands in this family has moved between corporate entities more than once, so the register entry rather than a marketing page is the only reliable answer at any given moment. Read the footer, then look the number up.
Are All Slots Casino sister sites licensed in Canada?
No, and neither is All Slots. Canada has no federal online casino licence. Ontario is the only province that licenses private online operators, through the AGCO and iGaming Ontario, and a site serving Ontario has to appear on the iGO operator list. Everywhere else in Canada, the sites people use hold Malta or Curacao licences and are regulated there rather than here.
Is it safe to hold accounts at several sister sites?
It is allowed. The bonuses usually are not. Group-wide terms normally restrict a welcome offer to one per person across all brands in the family, and claiming the same offer at three sister sites is the quickest way to have the winnings voided on all three. One account per brand, one welcome offer across the group.
Why do sister sites look identical?
Because they run the same platform. The lobby layout, the cashier, the bonus mechanics and often the support scripts are shared infrastructure with different branding painted on top. A genuinely different experience needs a different platform, not a different logo — which is worth remembering when a site is recommended to you as an alternative.
Does self-exclusion carry across sister sites?
Only within the same operator, and only if you ask for it explicitly. Excluding yourself at one brand does not close accounts at a site that merely shares software with a different company behind it. Say the words "group-wide" when you request it, then verify at each brand separately. In Ontario, the province also runs its own self-exclusion for iGO-registered sites.
How do I tell a real sister site from a lookalike?
Compare four things: the operating company named in the footer, the licence number next to it, the wording of the terms and conditions, and the descriptor that appears on your bank statement after a deposit. Two matches out of four is coincidence — shared software will do that. All four matching is a group.
Which sister site pays out fastest?
They behave alike, because they share a cashier: e-wallets same day, Interac one to two business days, cards slow and unreliable. Differences between brands come down to how quickly the approval desk is staffed rather than to the payment rails, so treat any brand in this family claiming instant withdrawals with the same scepticism you would apply here.
Because these brands share a cashier, the payment methods and withdrawal times pages apply to all of them almost unchanged. How we check this explains the method.